Right to Born

The right to be born depend on several different rights: the right to be conceived, the right to be implanted in the uterus, and the right to live. The right to be conceived, or the right of parents to reproduce, may depend on what circumstances they are in and this does not differentiate rich and poor. The first and foremost question which arises before right to born was do couples have the right to have children to whom they cannot offer an adequate upbringing? Do couples have the right to have as many children as they wish if they themselves are not ready to have a child? If the couple are ready to have children then are they ready to have more than one child until and unless they have twins? Rich people are able to complete fulfilment of their child but they to were not ready mentally as for their career or some personal reason, but poor people are like not able to complete their fulfillment of their children.

Fertilisation occurs in the fallopian tube, but only about 30% of fertilised ova normally become successfully implanted in the uterus. Fertilisation can also be achieved in a test tube and the resultant embryo then implanted in the mother's uterus to grow into a "test tube baby". Is it ethical to allow the use of donor sperm or ova, a surrogate mother, experimentation on embryos, and what should be done with "spare" embryos? The right to live and not be aborted may involve a conflict of interests between a mother and her unborn child. A mother may claim absolute rights over her own body, including the right to have an abortion if she desires. But question come up after the birth of the child that how the child be brought up? As population is growing year to year only because of birth of children but after that at what condition they are actually living is actually a question and this raise a question are right to birth should be necessary or not?